For her Grace Church Eden Prairie "Understanding the Times" crusade Saturday the 29th of September 2018,
Jan Markell required prepaid-by-credit-card entrance ticket purchases of $25 to $20 for auditorium seating,
not including tickets for lunch, according to her ticketing website.
That is a lot of money for people to pay to be propagandized with the clearly-deceptive anti-Scriptural lie that
they will not die from disease or injury but instead magically be whisked up to the sky
before having to choose whether or not to get marked with the antichrist's 666 tattoo
previous to Jesus bodily returning after the 42-month Great Tribulation.
Why vote for deficient candidates Walz and Ellison when one could instead vote for morally-decent
and sensible candidates Jeff Johnson and Doug Wardlow on November 6th 2018 or with Absentee Ballot?
Vote for anti-abortion-choice Minnesota U.S. Senate Candidate Jim Newberger . . .
NOT anti-Supreme-Court-Kavanaugh inferior-gender abortion-homicide-choice feminist-sexist Amy Klobuchar,
so as to not violate the no-women-in-charge-over-men Scripture verses of Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:12-13, First Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38, First Timothy 2:11-15, and First Peter 3:7:
Hatikva (men's chorus)
Jewish Men's Choir
Patton, Psalm 63
Why Believe the Bible?
Who is God?
Original Sin Nature?
Kyrie(Steve Dobrogosz)-國立臺南大學音樂系合唱團-National University of Tainan Chorus
Anti-Zionists, Judeans, and Samaritans in Canaan - NOT "palestinians"
Adolf Hitler, who claimed to be a Christian, stated that he wanted Christianity eradicated
Did Adolf Hitler ever call himself a Christian? Certainly. He did so, and as he would later admit, for the singular purpose of disseminating political propaganda.
"The only way of getting rid of Christianity is to allow it to die little by little."
– Adolf Hitler
Yes, there have been evil men who have done evil things in the name of false Christianity. To a limited degree, Adolf Hitler was one such man. Still, and as even he frequently admitted outside the public eye, he was no Christian.
As a counterweight to stigma associated with the tens of millions slaughtered in the 20th century alone under the atheist regimes of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, et al., the secular left is quick to thunder, "But what about Hitler? He was a Christian!"
Bad news, kids. Herr Führer was your guy too.
"I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie," Hitler confessed (audio transcribed in Hitler's Table Talk [1941-44]). "It would always be disagreeable for me to go down to posterity as a man who made concessions in this field [to be labeled a Christian]."
Did Adolf Hitler ever call himself a Christian? Certainly. He did so, and as he would later admit, for the singular purpose of disseminating political propaganda.
"To whom should propaganda be addressed?" he wrote. "It must be addressed always and exclusively to the masses. ... The whole art consists in doing this so skillfully that everyone will be convinced that the fact is real."
The Nazi Germans of the 1930s and '40s are not alone in swallowing Hitler's Christianese-peppered puffery. Today's secular-"progressive" establishment likewise bandies about a handful of carefully crafted Hitlerian quotes released for public consumption. His "pro-Christian" proclamations in Mein Kampf and elsewhere, for instance, were universally a perversion of biblical Christianity leveraged for the sole purpose of justifying the extermination of the Jewish people.
"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter," he wrote. "In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge [the Jews] to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. ... For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people."
That was the extent of Hitler's plastic "Christianity." The Bible, always taken out of context, served as a twisted weapon to justify the mass slaughter of over 11 million Jews, Christians, disabled people and other "undesirables."
In reality Hitler insisted, "In the long run, National Socialism and religion will no longer be able to exist together."
Sounds an awful lot like today's American church-state separatists. Roger Baldwin, founder of the ACLU, for example, held, "I am for socialism, disarmament and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself. ... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
Indeed, the ACLU's promotional materials similarly advocate anti-Christian intolerance and mirror Hitler's directive that, "Socialism and religion will no longer be able to exist together."
"The message of the Establishment Clause is that religious activities must be treated differently from other activities to ensure against governmental support for religion," imagines the "American" so-called "civil liberties" union.
That's viewpoint discrimination and it's unconstitutional.
This is secular socialism in a nutshell. It's a religion, and its devotees, be they Nazi Germans or American leftists, are Communist Manifesto-thumping fundamentalists.
"There is something very unhealthy about Christianity," Hitler opined. "As far as we are concerned, we've succeeded in chasing the Jews from our midst and excluding Christianity from our political life. ... The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. ... Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless."
Indeed, Hitler's robust anti-Christian hatred lives on beyond the death of the Third Reich.
Modern-day progressives like Hillary Clinton, though, tend to take a kinder, gentler, more surreptitiously totalitarian approach: "Rights have to exist in practice—not just on paper," the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee recently said in the context of some phantom "right" to exterminate undesirable infants. "Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed."
While Hitler was more direct, he nonetheless shared Hillary's secular vision: "We'll see to it that the Churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State. We shall continue to preach the doctrine of National Socialism, and the young will no longer be taught anything but the truth."
Sound familiar? Progressive "truth," of course, invariably means Christian torment.
Hitler, borrowing from socialist icon Karl Marx, said that all Germans must "free themselves from the drug of Christianity. Let's be the only people who are immunized against the disease." Marx, a hero to the secular socialist left, famously called religion, "the opium of the people."
Hitler a Christian? No chance.
Moreover, like the preponderance of today's similarly anti-Semitic secular progressives, Hitler, too, was an apologist for Islam. As America's own dear leader has done, Hitler partnered with Iran, present-day "Palestine" and other Islamist regimes in the shared goal of eliminating the Jews: "The world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity!" he fumed. "Then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so!"
Hitler also parroted the godless ideology of modern atheists. Like so many of today's secular progressives, he was an avowed materialist, neo-Darwinian evolutionist and hardhearted God-denier: "When understanding of the universe has become widespread, when the majority of men know that the stars are not sources of light but worlds, perhaps inhabited worlds like ours, then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity."
"Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity," he said. "And that's why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline."
Two thousand years and still waiting.
And so Hitler endeavored to assist "natural selection" and, as he wrote in Mein Kampf, "establish an evolutionary higher stage of being." He placed his hope in Germany's youth because they were "absolutely indifferent in the matters of religion."
A beloved Hitler Youth marching song captured the Führer's heart on matters of Christ and Christianity:
We follow not Christ, but Horst Wessel,
Away with incense and Holy Water,
The Church can go hang for all we care,
The Swastika brings salvation on Earth.
Today's progressive "social justice" warriors are angling for a dystopian, Swastika-free repeat. Their hope, too, lies in the youth (witness the socialism-fueled anarchist insurgence occurring on college campuses nationwide).
Like then, progressive secular socialists endeavor to rule the world.
And "Christianity alone," to update Hitler's own words, will "prevent them from doing so."
(Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of barbwire.com. He is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war).
Cateresy: Atonement by Ingesting Eucharist?
NO woman should orate in a pulpit nor at a lecturn
near the altar in any Christian church, Islamic mosque, or Jewish synagogue
within a congregation containing men, per First Corinthians 14:33-38 and First Timothy 2:11-14.
Also, NO child 12 and under (noisy or not) should be allowed entrance into any religious-worship sanctuary
per Job 6:24 & 13:5, Psalm 62:1, Proverbs 22:15, Ecclesiastes 3:7, Isaiah 3:12 & 47:5, Habakkuk 2:20,
Zephaniah 1:7 and Zechariah 2:13
Although genuine "ladies" should wear socks with shoes when in general
mixed-gender public view . . .
. . . the natural spouse with non-painted fingernails and no toenail polish is
at her sexually-attractive, most-erotically-appealing, desirable best!
Kyrie(Mass) / Steve Dobrogosz
Three Heresies Refuted
Which to Wear: hijab, niqab, chador, or burka?
Free Will & Blood Sacrifice?
Law to Save?
Roy Moore and the Election of December 2017
Law to Yet Obey, or Faith Only not Fruits-of-the-Spirit Good Works for Salvation?
Without providing the redemptive Jesus Christ as benevolent "Contingency Plan" against
God deliberately imposing the Tempter in the Garden of Eden, His creation
would NOT have been "good" as it states in Genesis chapter one.
Martin Luther and the Jews
Some Causes Why Hitler Hated Jews
Some Reasons Hitlers Failed and Instead Could Have Won
Why Some Jews Do Not Accept Jesus As the Messiah
A jew Misconsiders the Concept of Trinity As Attributes Instead of Essence of The Person(s) to Worship
A Jew Recognizes the Need for Repentance to Absolve Sin, but Is That A Sufficient Sacrifice to Eradication the Penalty against Sin?
Rabbi Says that Light Creates Darkness Which Provides Light, and that God Cannot Commit Suicide, Which Proves (to Him) that God did not Beget His Son of God Jesus Christ instead of mere Prophet and was Not Jewish because Jesus Had no Earthly Father
Proverbs 30:4 [ English Standard Version (ESV) ] =Who has ascended to Heaven and come down? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has wrapped up the waters in a garment? Who has established all the ends of the Earth? What is His name, and what is His Son's name? Surely you know!
Isaiah 9:6 = To us a Child is born, to us a Son is given, and the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called: Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
This author had previously read about a discrepancy involving two supposedly different Old-Testament Hebrew texts of the Bible:
1. The ben Asher
2. The ben Chayyim
I thus typed in both of them (one at a time) into major internet search engines to investigate.
One KJV-only diehard wrote on the subject, failing to declare that there was once a need for the creation of the at-that-time new King James Version itself, and that "the KJV" has undergone many revision and edition changes.
He mentioned "THE Masoretic Text" without defining if THAT meant the ben Chayyim or the ben Asher text (purportedly discrepant against each other). He condemned Rudolf Kittel and his editor Kahle for putting footnotes in the text of their Stuttgart-edition Hebrew Bible based on a Leningrad Manuscript - with the presumption that Kittel wanted to confuse readers by insinuating that they randomly replace the main text with footnote alterations or substitutions. He went on to state that the American Bible Society offers an 1866-incepted Letteris
(ben Chayyim) Hebrew Old-Testament text for sale, but this author has never seen any such advertisement from ABS at any time ever.
Mr. KJV-only also failed to state WHY the ben Asher Hebrew Text was THE (recognized)
Received Text in authority until the 1500s, but somehow lost that authenticity until Kittel's 1937 edition of ben Asher's Text - which Text the RSV and NASV are thankfully based upon.
Mr. KJV-only gave credence to a certain "Daniel Bomberg" (whoever HE was) and who (according to the preface of the NKJV Bible) concocted and printed a so-called "first rabbinic bible" in 1516 (whatever THAT was)......followed by [oh oh!]: a SECOND edition (the FIRST was NOT GOOD ENOUGH)?
One internet source stated that Jacob ben Chayyim was apparently "some jewish refugee" who the source alleged to have become a Christian (sounds suspicious)! So WHO WAS ben Chayyim, and what were his motives for trashing the
traditional ben Asher Text?
With all this in mind, I synthesized three internet pieces from one Jewish author giving further info about ben Asher:
Aaron ben Moses ben Asher lived in Tiberius during the first half of the 10th century. His family had been involved in creating and maintaining the MASORAH for either five or six generations. Ben Asher rapidly gained fame as
the most authoritative of the Tiberian masoretes, and even after his death, his name continued to hold respect. His vocalization of the Bible is still - for all intents and purposes - THE Text Jews continue
Moreover, Aaron ben Moses ben Asher was the first to take Hebrew grammar seriously. His SEFER
DIKDUKEI HA-TE'AMIM (Grammar of the Vocalizations) was an original collection of grammatical rules and masoretic information. Grammatical principles were not at that time considered worthy of independent study.
Ben Asher had a tremendous influence on the world of Biblical grammar and scholarship. From documents found in the CAIRO GENIZA, it appears that this most famous masorete (and possibly his family for generations) were also - incidently - KARAITES.
As early as the eighth century, Talmudic rabbis encountered a major challenge. A group of Jews led by Anan ben David declared that they did not accept the authority of the rabbis to interpret Torah. This group, originally called the
Ananites, developed their own understanding of Jewish law based only on the written Torah.
The Ananites were stricter and more rigid than the rabbis in their understanding of Torah law. They simply did not accept the rabbis as legitimate authorities of Jewish law. They denied the authority of the Mishnah and the Gemarra.
It is difficult to determine Ananite doctrines because the Ananites relied on the Torah Text. Anan's famous adage was:"Search thoroughly the Torah and don't rely on my opinions."
In the ninth century, the major group of Ananites combined with other anti-rabbinic groups and became known as the Karaites (followers of the Kra, or Torah Text) in their Masoretic tradition of including VOWELS in the Torah Text. They believed that the Torah had originally been written with vowels, and they viewed such Text as the ONLY legitimate one.
It should not be surprising to discover that many masoretes, so involved in the Masorah, held Karaite beliefs. After all, it was the Karaites who placed such absolute reliance on the Torah Text. It would be natural that they would devote
their lives to studying every aspect of it. The surprising element was that being a Karaite did not disqualify Aaron ben Moses ben Asher in the eyes of Rabbinic Jews.
Codex Leningradensis) is the oldest complete manuscript of the Hebrew Bible in Hebrew, using the masoretic text and Tiberian vocalization. It is dated 1008 CE (or possibly 1009) according to its colophon. The Aleppo Codex, against which the Leningrad Codex was corrected, is several decades older, but parts of it have been missing since 1947, making the Leningrad Codex the oldest complete codex of the Tiberian mesorah that has survived intact to this day.
Comparison of Various Bible-Verse Wording in Different Bible Translations
In modern times, the Leningrad Codex is significant as the Hebrew text reproduced in Biblia Hebraica (1937) and Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (1977). It also serves scholars as a primary source for the recovery of details in the missing parts of the Aleppo Codex.
The biblical text as found in the codex contains the Hebrew letter-text along with Tiberian vowels and cantillation signs. In addition, there are masoretic notes in the margins. There are also various technical supplements dealing with textual and linguistic details, many of which are painted in geometrical forms. The codex is written on parchment and bound in leather.
The Leningrad Codex, in extraordinarily pristine condition after a millennium, also provides an example of medieval Jewish art. Sixteen of the pages contain decorative geometric patterns that illuminate passages from the text. The carpet page shows a star with the names of the scribes on the edges and a blessing written in the middle.
The order of the books in the Leningrad Codex follows the Tiberian textual tradition, which is also that of the later tradition of Sephardic biblical manuscripts. This order for the books differs markedly from that of most printed Hebrew bibles for the books of the Ketuvim. In the Leningrad Codex, the order of the Ketuvim is: Chronicles, Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ruth, Song of Songs, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, Esther, Daniel, Ezra-Nehemiah.
According to its colophon, the codex was copied in Cairo from manuscripts written by Aaron ben Moses ben Asher. It has been claimed to be a product of the Asher scriptorium itself.
In its vocalization system (vowel points and cantillation) it is considered by scholars to be the most faithful representative of ben Asher's tradition apart from the Aleppo Codex (edited by ben Asher himself). Its letter-text is not superb.
The codex is now preserved in the National Library of Russia, accessioned as "Firkovich B 19 A". Its former owner, the Crimean Karaite collector Abraham Firkovich, left no indication in his writings where he had acquired the codex, which was taken to Odessa in 1838 and later transferred to the Imperial Library in St Petersburg.
The Leningrad Codex (a codex is a hand-written book as opposed to a scroll) is so named because it has been housed at the National Library of Russia in Saint Petersburg since 1863. In 1924, after the Russian Revolution, Petrograd (formerly Saint Petersburg) was renamed Leningrad, and, because the codex was used as the basic text for the Biblia Hebraica since 1937, it became internationally known as the "Leningrad Codex".
Although in 1991, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the city's original name was restored to St Petersburg, the National Library of Russia requested that "Leningrad" be retained in the name of the codex. Nonetheless, the Codex is occasionally referred to as the Codex Petersburgensis or Petropolitanus, or the St. Petersburg Codex. This is ambiguous as, since 1876, these appellations refer to a different biblical codex (MS. Heb B 3) which is even older (916 CE), but contains only the later Prophets.
In 1935, the Leningrad Codex was lent to the Old Testament Seminar of the University of Leipzig for two years while Paul E. Kahle supervised its transcription for the Hebrew text of the third edition of Biblia Hebraica (BHK), published in Stuttgart, 1937. The codex was also used for Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS) in 1977, and is being used for Biblia Hebraica Quinta (BHQ).
As an original work by Tiberian masoretes, the Leningrad Codex was older by several centuries than the other Hebrew manuscripts which had been used for all previous editions of printed Hebrew bibles until Biblia Hebraica.
The Westminster Leningrad Codex is an online digital version of the Leningrad Codex maintained by the J. Alan Groves Center for Advanced Biblical Research at the Westminster Theological Seminary. This is a verified version of the Michigan-Claremont text, transcribed from BHS at the University of Michigan in 1981-1982 under the direction of H. Van Dyke Parunak (of the University of Michigan) and Richard E. Whitaker (of the Institute for Antiquity and Christianity, Claremont Graduate University) with funding from the Packard Foundation and the University of Michigan, with further proofreading and corrections. The online version includes transcription notes and tools for analyzing syntax.
The Leningrad Codex also served as the basis for two important modern Jewish editions of the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh):
* The Dotan edition, which was distributed to soldiers in mass quantities as the official Tanakh of the Israel Defense Forces throughout the 1990s.
* The JPS Hebrew-English Tanakh (Philadelphia, 1999) and the various volumes of the JPS Torah Commentary and JPS Bible Commentary.
For minute masoretic details, however, Israeli and Jewish scholars have shown a marked preference for modern Hebrew editions based upon the Aleppo Codex. These editions use the Leningrad Codex as the most important source (but not the only one) for the reconstruction of parts of the Aleppo Codex that have been missing since 1947.
All-Season Public-Modesty Dress Code
Graduation Final Exam
God FOR Wine!
Print, re-copy, distribute, and utilize this as an Annual Mate-a-Thon Application and Questionnaire!
Bare Arms in General-Public View?
Not for All
Can jews better themselves by themselves alone . . .
or do they always or sometimes need help from gentile Christians?
Jealous and legalistic jews (taking the practice of animal-blood-sacrifice-for-atonement
to the extreme by murdering Jewish Jesus, by command-to-others bodily assault or by cowardly desertion
. . . though some of them later repented of that and became ardent devout Christians)
were to blame for Christ's death on a cross . . .
Jesus Himself was to blame for suicidally letting them pseudo--"legally" murder
(NOT "execute") Him -- when He easily could have prevented all that from occurring.
Ilan Sharon is a jewish soldier of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) and pro-Israeli lecturer.
Amir Tsarfati (http://beholdisrael.org/news-israel/news) is also a Jewish soldier of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) and news commentator from a Christian perspective.
Kenyan-Born Obama, Vote Trump not Clinton, Israel not "Palestine"
Barack Hussein Obama: The pseudo-"christian" Muslim
The subversive media has attempted to dumb-down the American people painting a picture that the crisis in Egypt is simply a matter of innocent Egyptians who want "democracy" versus Mubarak-supporting mobs attacking the so-called "freedom" demonstrators. That is an outright lie. It is bad enough to tell a lie, but it is worse to believe it.
Osama bin Laden Predicts Obama Will Become President and Subjugate America
The antisemitic dishonest media are trying to define the terms of the debate in Egypt through lies. Why? They don't really believe that the terrorists behind this chaos are evil. Nor do they believe evil really exists. These new-agers hate Israel, the Bible, and Christians in general.
The media attacks have become so severe anyone that contradicts them is considered ignorant, evil, racist, and a bigot. This is done in the name of purported political "correctness" and godless globalism. It is the theater of the absurd and a festival of hypocrisy.
President Mubarak has been a U.S. ally fighting terror for thirty years. The center of gravity for world terror is Egypt, and it was Anwar Sadat who refused to give ground to the terror organization in his own country. Where was the PLO birthed in 1964? Cairo, Egypt. Where was Sadat assassinated? Egypt. From where did Mohammad Atta, the brains behind the 9/11 attack come? Egypt. From where did Sheikh Abdul Rahman, the planner for the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center come? Egypt!
What the heretical media is doing in Egypt and in the United States should be called treason. If Hitler controlled the media today in Egypt, he could not do a better job than the "american" media. They see these terrorist devils as "freedom fighters" … little George Washingtons. This is exactly what happened to our strongest ally, the Shah of Iran. I know; I've interviewed more than fifty Iranian government officials including the former empress of Iran and the last Iranian ambassador to the United States, most of the Shah's cabinet alive today, twenty-one Iranian diplomats, and the current madman who presides as president of Iran today, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
It is adultery between deviant mediapersons and a hatefully-muslim president. The Muslim Brotherhood has been trying to assassinate Mubarak and overthrow Egypt for decades. Not only is the PLO involved in this revolution in Egypt, so is al-Qaeda, and Iran with its two long arms of terror, Hamas and Hezbollah. Yes, al-Qaeda operatives are in Cairo doing everything possible to fan the flames. Please forward this to everyone on your email list. Only the truth will set us free.
Hussein, the Muslim
WHO to BLAME?